ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Design and evaluation of a streamlined enrichment method for faster co-detection of enteric bacterial pathogens in natural soils and environmental samples.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study developed a streamlined, sensitive and rapid method for co-detection of low concentrations of Salmonella enterica, Shigella flexneri, Listeria monocytogenes, and pathogenic Escherichia coli from soil. First, autoclaved soil from Iowa with serial dilutions of bacteria to confirm individual species recovery rates on selective agar by qPCR under varying primary enrichment times was used. All pathogens were detected by qPCR of colonies recovered from replicate sterile soils spiked with 10^1 or greater bacteria within 5 hours of enrichment. Shiga toxin expressing E. coli (STEC) and L. monocytogenes were consistently co-recovered in autoclaved and natural soil, pathogen spiking concentration, and secondary enrichment time. S.enterica was consistently recovered at autoclaved and natural concentrations, while S. flexneri detection rates fluctuated. Twenty-three soil samples from Kenyan neighborhoods, with prior evidence of contamination, was compared to qPCR detection at each protocol stage: processing, primary enrichment, secondary enrichment, and selective colony isolation. Detection rates substantially increased for S. enterica, STEC and other pathogenic E. coli after enrichment, with optimal detection rates occurring after secondary enrichment. Testing colonies from selective agar resulted in high false negative rates, possibly reflecting competition from native soil microbiota that was absent in spiked sterile soil experiment. Evaluation of the method with other environmental sample types yielded consistent detection patterns. Evidence suggests a protocol including 24-hour primary enrichment, followed by 24-hour secondary enrichment, and qPCR testing of soil DNA at primary and secondary steps is a reproducible and more expedient method for co-detecting common Enterobacteriaceae and L. monocytogenes pathogens in soil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.