Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818499›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Comparative Study of Anatomical and Learned Features in AI Models for Structural Brain MRI.

Boyang Yu, Miquel Lopez Escoriza, Long Chen, Arjun V Masurkar, Narges Razavian, Carlos Fernandez-Granda

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Boyang YuCenter for Data Science, New York University, NYU, 60 Fifth Ave, New York, 10011, New York, United States.
Miquel Lopez EscorizaCenter for Data Science, New York University, NYU, 60 Fifth Ave, New York, 10011, New York, United States.
Long ChenCenter for Data Science, New York University, NYU, 60 Fifth Ave, New York, 10011, New York, United States.
Arjun V MasurkarDepartment of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 1st Ave, New York, 10016, New York, United States.
Narges RazavianDepartment of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 1st Ave, New York, 10016, New York, United States.
Carlos Fernandez-GrandaCenter for Data Science, New York University, NYU, 60 Fifth Ave, New York, 10011, New York, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we comprehensively evaluate three popular feature-extraction paradigms in AI-based neuroimaging modeling: (1) computation of anatomical surfaces and volumes, (2) supervised learning with convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and (3) unsupervised pretraining of vision transformer (ViT) foundation models, followed by supervised finetuning. Our study is based on 18 publicly available datasets containing 3D structural T1-weighted MRI scans from approximately 80,000 participants across seven distinct clinical tasks. We observe that a linear model based on anatomical features matches the diagnostic performance of complex nonlinear features learned by sophisticated AI frameworks, including foundation models trained on thousands of scans. Conversely, CNNs and pretrained ViTs learn features that implicitly capture relevant anatomical information, bypassing the need for explicit feature extraction. Building upon these insights, we propose Anatomy Segmentation Pretraining (ASP), a novel method to incorporate anatomical information during foundation-model pretraining, which outperforms existing models in biological age estimation.

Indexed as

brain anatomyDeep learningneuroimagingpretrainingsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID42818499
PMCPMC13622820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.