ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Self-supervised plasma proteomic representations for prospective disease prediction across varying protein availability.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large-scale plasma proteomics offers opportunities to characterize disease susceptibility and improve prospective risk prediction, but transferring proteomic predictors across datasets remains challenging because measured protein sets differ across cohorts, study phases and assay configurations. Here we developed a self-supervised protein-token Transformer that maps the proteins observed in each sample to a fixed-dimensional participant representation, allowing unavailable proteins to be omitted rather than imputed. Using plasma proteomic profiles from 53,014 participants in the UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics Project, we pretrained the encoder by masked-protein reconstruction and evaluated whether disease models developed from comprehensive 2,920-protein profiles could be reused with a predefined subset of 1,460 proteins. Across 144 diseases, median AUC was 0.679 with comprehensive coverage and 0.637 when the same encoder and disease models were applied to partial-coverage representations without refitting; retraining only the disease-specific models increased median AUC to 0.673. Under partial coverage, protein-token proteomic risk scores (ProRS) exceeded coefficient-truncated LASSO ProRS by a median paired AUC difference of 0.027 and were comparable to LASSO ProRS refitted using outcome labels, with a median difference of 0.003. Performance was relatively stable across cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic diseases but more heterogeneous across autoimmune diseases, while protein-token representations improved discrimination beyond clinical covariates for 10 of 12 focused diseases under partial coverage without refitting. These results support self-supervised protein-token representations as a strategy for building proteomic prediction models that remain usable across heterogeneous measurement settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.