ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Partner-inflicted brain injury may cognitively age survivors by over a decade.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: More than a third of women in the United States are estimated to experience abuse by an intimate partner, and blows to the head and strangulation are common in such instances. Yet the cognitive consequences of partner-inflicted brain injuries remain poorly characterized relative to brain injuries from other mechanisms, such as athletics and military service, and study sample sizes have tended to be small. The degree to which these injuries accumulate into measurable cognitive harm, whether the harm of such injuries can be quantified in a meaningful way, and how that harm compares with better-recognized causes of repetitive head injury, has not been established. Rationale: We administered ten cognitive tests, scored across sixteen domains, to 207 women with lifetime exposure to physical intimate partner violence, of whom 67% ( Results: Women who had sustained any partner-inflicted brain injury performed below the general population mean on 11 of the 16 cognitive abilities measured, from reasoning ( Conclusion: Women experiencing partner-inflicted brain injuries demonstrated cognitive aging of over 20 years, and yet, the true cognitive harms of such injury are likely more severe than those reported here. These results are particularly grave because partner-inflicted injuries may compromise the very cognitive capacities women must rely on to leave abusive relationships, care for their children, sustain employment, navigate legal proceedings, and remain safe post-violence. Taken together, these findings underscore partner-inflicted brain injury as a major, under-recognized source of cognitive harm, potentially affecting more women than brain injury in professional football or the military while lacking comparable clinical recognition and care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.