ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Adaptation and Validation of Brief Tablet-Based Cognitive Assessment Tool in Uganda.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Sub-Saharan Africa (sSA) faces accelerated growth in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs), including in older people living with HIV (PLWH). However, there are limited contextually relevant diagnostic tools to assess cognitive impairment in the region. The Tablet-based Cognitive Assessment Tool (TabCAT) is a digital platform hosting cognitive tests with automated scoring that can be administered by non-specialists and are designed for use across diverse cultures, languages, and education levels. We translated, adapted, and assessed the validity of a brief battery of TabCAT tests in the Uganda Aging and Dementia Cohort Study (UADCS), a prospective cohort of older PLWH and age- and sex-similar adults not living with HIV in southwestern Uganda. Methods: Four TabCAT tests were translated and culturally adapted through expert review and focus groups of adults at study sites. Psychometric validity was examined by assessing floor and ceiling effects, association with known demographic predictors, and concurrent and divergent validity against a reference-standard cognitive testing battery previously validated and employed in Uganda. Z-scores on all tests were derived using a regression-based normative approach to adjust for age, sex, education, urbanicity, and literacy. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were fit to assess the TabCAT Composite Score performance in discriminating objective cognitive impairment (defined using Jak/Bondi criteria) in the total sample, then stratified by HIV serostatus. Results: TabCAT tests were reported by local experts and focus groups to have acceptable face and content validity. Participants (n=563, mean age 60±6.4, 50% female, 51% did not complete primary school, 16% were not literate, 49% PLWH) completed the reference-standard and TabCAT battery. For TabCAT tests, there were no notable floor or ceiling effects, and test scores were associated with age and education as expected. Correlations between TabCAT and reference-standard tests were stronger in aligning cognitive domains (memory, executive function) than in non-aligning domains (motor). The TabCAT Composite Score discriminated cognitive impairment with good performance (c-statistic 0.77; 95% CI 0.72-0.81), including among PLWH. Discussion: TabCAT tests demonstrated face, content, construct, concurrent, and criterion validity for measuring cognition and detecting objective cognitive impairment among older adults in Uganda, including PLWH. These results support the potential of tablet-based brief cognitive assessment tools to measure cognitive performance and detect cognitive impairment in Uganda, including among older PLWH, and in populations with lower levels of education and literacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.