Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818362›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Neural and autonomic predictors of future listening errors.

Samuel S Smith, Jenna A Sugai, Kenneth E Hancock, Daniel B Polley

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel S SmithEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear; Boston MA, 02114 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0991-8224
Jenna A SugaiEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear; Boston MA, 02114 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6145-4909
Kenneth E HancockEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear; Boston MA, 02114 USA.
Daniel B PolleyEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear; Boston MA, 02114 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5120-2409

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some of the most demanding perceptual tasks require sustained vigilance to detect and classify infrequent, unpredictable targets within continuous sensory streams. Here, we designed a sustained listening task to ask whether cardinal classes of perceptual errors (misclassifications, miss, and false alarms) were associated with variability in event-related processing, ongoing cortical state, and autonomic arousal. We recorded 64-channel scalp EEG and pupil diameter in 39 adults while they monitored streams of random tone pips for occasional target sequences of repeating tones. A target-evoked negativity varied systematically with listening outcome: it was largest for correct reports, reduced for misclassifications, and nearly absent for misses. Notably, these differences emerged within the first 500 ms of the target sequence, before the information needed to classify its length was available. Related negativities also accompanied false alarms despite the absence of a target. By contrast, neural synchronization to acoustic cues in individual tone pips did not differ across perceptual outcomes. We then looked further back in time, to the 1 s period preceding target onset, and identified additional signatures of forthcoming misclassifications and false alarms in pupil diameter and EEG aperiodic slopes. Models evaluated with leave-one-subject-out cross-validation showed that baseline state measures and event-related negativity amplitude provided complementary information about the probability and type of forthcoming errors. These findings link perceptual errors during sustained listening to higher-order cortical and arousal-state dynamics rather than fluctuant encoding of bottom-up acoustic cues.

Identifiers

PMID42818362
PMCPMC13622620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.