Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818348›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Mechanistic Interpretability of Protein Language Models Reveals Encoded Structural and Functional Properties of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Lauren Naworski, Lydia L Good, Rob Scrutton, Tuomas P J Knowles

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauren NaworskiYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.
Lydia L GoodYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5308-8542
Rob ScruttonYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-0012-0703
Tuomas P J KnowlesYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7879-0140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein language models (PLMs) such as ESM-2 encode protein sequences as embeddings for downstream tasks. PLMs are trained on a masked learning objective that leverages evolutionary constraints. While interpretability studies of ESM-2 have focused on folded proteins, their behavior on intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), which constitute a substantial fraction of the human proteome and are implicated in numerous diseases, remains understudied. Because IDPs experience different types of evolutionary constraints on their amino acid sequences, we hypothesized that PLMs would behave differently on disordered versus folded regions. Here we show that ESM-2 exhibits reduced attention on disordered regions, yet still encodes meaningful biological signals. The model assigns heightened attention to disease-relevant residues even at high levels of disorder. Moreover, we show that both the radius of gyration and individual dynamic contact maps, key characteristics of IDPs, can be obtained from the model logits and embeddings. These findings suggest PLMs capture valuable information relevant to IDP biology despite their bias toward structured residues.

Indexed as

AblationAttentionInterpretabilityIntrinsically Disordered ProteinProtein Language ModelTransformer

Identifiers

PMID42818348
PMCPMC13622618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.