ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Kintsugi decides, gene by gene, where spatial transcriptomics borrows information.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subcellular spatial transcriptomics captures where RNA is in tissue, but a single location holds too few molecules of any one gene to estimate composition alone. Every current method fixes in advance where to borrow - a smoothing scale, a cell outline or a factor model - and the fixed choice shapes what is visible. Kintsugi removes the fixed choice and lets held-out molecules decide, gene by gene, how much to borrow from spatial neighbours and from other genes at the same location. On a lung section measured by both Xenium and Visium HD, the data-chosen allocation placed an epithelial programme where the Xenium molecules were, ahead of smoothing, cell segmentation and a factor model; the result replicated across tissues and against protein. Across a 45-core pulmonary fibrosis cohort, separating composition from captured amount shows that a fibroblastic focus is not a place with more RNA but a place with different RNA: 2.8-fold higher in activated-fibroblast composition while segmented nuclear density is at most 1.08-fold higher.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.