ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Improving Metagenomics Classification with Kmask: Entropy-Based Masking of Low-Complexity Regions.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate taxonomic classification in metagenomics is often compromised by low-complexity sequences, which lead to chance matches that in turn cause sequences to be misclassified. Here we present Kmask, an entropy-based masking tool implemented for use either standalone or as part of Kraken [1,2] database construction, which replaces low-entropy regions with Ns. Using a sliding window size aligned with Kraken's default k-mer length and parameters optimized across 12 control bacterial genomes spanning a broad range of GC content, Kmask efficiently removes low-complexity sequences while retaining high-complexity regions. To benchmark performance, we applied Kmask to a newly constructed database, Microbial2025, that contains over 71,000 bacterial, archaeal, viral, and fungal genomes, and we then classified human reads against both masked and unmasked versions of the database using KrakenUniq [2]. We found that Kmask substantially reduced misclassifications, driving down the false positive rate to 5.78% from 7.52%. Notably, Kmask performed comparably to an SDUST-masked [3] database, achieving a similar false positive rate (5.78% vs. 5.17%) while masking out fewer bases (1.33% vs. 1.85%). We also tested Kmask on a database of human cancer sequences, where we found that it eliminated many false positives caused by low-complexity matches between bacterial genomes and human DNA. These results demonstrate that Kmask is an effective method for masking low-complexity sequences in large microbial databases, thus improving the accuracy of metagenomic classification.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.