Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818247›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

A Transferable Genomic Language Model Framework for Fungal Gene Essentiality Prediction.

Chen Liao, Hannah G Thomas

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chen LiaoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8474-1196
Hannah G ThomasDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.

Funding

Translational Research CoreP30DK117469 · NIDDK · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Bruce A. Stanton · 2018 to 2026
$13.9M
Developing genome-scale fluxomics to uncover metabolic reprogramming in human pathogens during infectionDP2AI200956 · NIAID · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Chen Liao · 2026 to 2026
$459k
Unraveling the ecology of intestinal fungal expansion in immunocompromised patients through computational modeling and machine learningR00AI175599 · NIAID · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI LIAO, CHEN · 2025 to 2025
$247k
NIAID NIH HHS DP2 AI200956NIAID NIH HHS R00 AI175599NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK117469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting biological function from genomic sequence remains a major challenge in computational and systems biology. Here, we tested whether the genomic language model Evo2, which encodes context-dependent DNA sequence patterns into embeddings, enables prediction of essential genes in fungi, a phenotype central to fungal biology and antifungal target discovery. We found that model performance was constrained not by the type or complexity of the downstream classifier, but by the biological information contained in Evo2 DNA embeddings. Specifically, the information recoverable from these embeddings progressively declined for biological features further downstream of DNA sequence, revealing a bottleneck for predicting higher-order cellular phenotypes. We alleviated this bottleneck by integrating Evo2 embeddings with two sequence-informed, system-level features: ortholog-based essentiality and protein-protein interactions. The multimodal framework demonstrated consistent performance both within and across three evolutionarily divergent yeasts (

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedrug discoveryEvo2fungigene essentialitygenomic language modelsmachine learningprotein-protein interaction

Identifiers

PMID42818247
PMCPMC13622507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.