ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
FFPE-CUTAC: A Single Assay, Multiple Layers.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Archival biobanks of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens represent a vast and underused resource for retrospective molecular studies linked to clinical follow-up. However, fixation-induced chemical modification and nucleic acid fragmentation limit scalable genomic and transcriptomic profiling. FFPE-CUTAC (Cleavage Under Targeted Accessible Chromatin) is an RNA polymerase II-targeted DNA assay specifically designed to profile regulatory activity in FFPE tissue. Here, we assess its archival robustness, information content, compatibility with RNA-seq, and ability to recover copy-number alterations. Results: In meningioma and breast cancer cohorts, we benchmarked FFPE-CUTAC against matched fresh-frozen RNA-seq, FFPE RNA-seq and FFPE whole-genome sequencing. For FFPE specimens spanning up to 25 years, FFPE-CUTAC showed no systematic collection-year-associated decline in library yield or signal-quality metrics. In contrast, FFPE RNA-seq is more affected by the FFPE tissue degradation and specimen age on read composition, gene-body coverage, and gene detection. By measuring RNA polymerase II occupancy on chromatin rather than mature RNA abundance, FFPE-CUTAC is less constrained by transcript half-life, polyadenylation or transcript-capture design. FFPE-CUTAC extends beyond gene regions to non-coding regulatory elements, while the shared gene-level signals supported its integration with existing RNA-seq cohorts for large-scale, long-term clinical association study. FFPE-CUTAC libraries also retain DNA dosage information and can be used to recover chromosome-arm gain, loss and intact states with 96% concordance to matched whole-genome sequencing. Conclusions: By converting routinely preserved pathology sections into integrated regulatory and copy-number profiles, FFPE-CUTAC provides a practical foundation for constructing clinically annotated disease maps to support molecular stratification, prognostic modeling and treatment-association studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.