ArticleArXiv2026
A DEEP NEURAL NETWORK FOR PREDICTING CONTINUOUS HUMAN EEG ACROSS THE AUDITORY PATHWAY IN RESPONSE TO SOUND.
Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational models of auditory physiology commonly target specific responses or stages of the auditory pathway, limiting their ability to integrate findings across experimental paradigms and neural timescales. We present a foundation model of human auditory electrophysiology: a causal neural network trained to map binaural acoustic waveforms directly to high-sample-rate EEG. The model was trained on approximately 250 hours of EEG data from 92 subjects, with varied electrode montages and stimuli spanning tonebursts, speech, and music. We tested whether the model recovered effects of stimulus rate, frequency, and presentation method on auditory brainstem responses (ABRs); subcortical and cortical temporal response functions (TRFs) to continuous speech; and the click-evoked binaural interaction component (BIC). Predicted ABRs and TRFs reproduced established response morphology and stimulus-dependent effects, with model-grand-average correlations falling within the corresponding subject-level human distributions. The model-predicted BIC metrics closely resembled the values reported in the literature. These findings demonstrate that a single audio-to-EEG model can capture auditory physiology across paradigms and timescales, supporting future
Indexed as
Identifiers
42818211PMC13622436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.