Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42818193›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Predicting Supramolecular Self-Assembly of Peptide Structures with AlphaFold3.

Claire Sklar, Jessie Huh, Sabrina Chen, Jeffrey J Gray

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claire SklarDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-5033-1734
Jessie HuhDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-1432-1568
Sabrina ChenDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-8076-4535
Jeffrey J GrayDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6380-2324

Funding

Prediction of the Structures of Protein ComplexesR35GM141881 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFREY J GRAY · 2021 to 2026
$7.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-assembled peptide-based nanostructures have diverse applications in the pharmaceutical and materials fields, but accurately predicting their self-assembly behavior without time-intensive organic synthesis and characterization remains a significant challenge. Here, we assess the effectiveness of AlphaFold3 (AF3), a deep learning model for protein structure prediction, in modeling peptide-based nanostructures and the interactions driving supramolecular self-assembly. We designed amphiphilic peptides composed of alternating hydrophobic residues (valine, leucine, isoleucine, phenylalanine) and hydrophilic residues (glutamic acid), varying both sequence length and residue order. Using AF3's multimer mode, we modeled assemblies with copy numbers ranging from 10 to 1000, generating diverse morphologies such as micelles and nanotubes. We qualitatively analyzed hydrophobic regions, secondary structures, and intermolecular interactions, while also calculating radii of gyration, packing scores, and aspect ratios using PyRosetta. Our results indicate that AF3 predicts morphologies consistent with hydrophobic driving forces and steric constraints. Increased hydrophobicity correlates with smaller radii of gyration, while higher copy numbers correspond to smaller aspect ratios (more compact structures). Longer hydrophobic segments lead to disordered structures, whereas longer hydrophilic segments promote organization. While AF3 captures systemic trends consistent with biophysical principles, comparisons to literature reveal discrepancies driven by charge effects and secondary structure bias, including an overemphasis on helical propensity (e.g., alanine-rich sequences) and sensitivity to terminal charge repulsion. Additionally, since AF3 is predisposed to predict a single assembled entity rather than higher-order assemblies such as multiple micelles or fibers, finding the optimal copy number for the best prediction requires system-specific iteration. These limitations highlight the need for complementary approaches with controlled chemical potential and environmental conditions, though qualitative agreement with experimental trends in morphology and compactness supports AF3's utility for initial structure generation. Our findings highlight AF3's potential as a user-friendly first pass screening tool for peptide design, enabling rapid generation and prioritization of candidate assemblies for subsequent evaluation using coarse-grained or all-atom molecular simulations toward the efficient development of functional self-assembled peptide nanomaterials.

Identifiers

PMID42818193
PMCPMC13622397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.