ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Motor cortex pain compensation is modifiable: allostatic load degrades its analgesic efficiency and rehabilitation restores it.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The primary motor cortex is a critical hub for pain control, yet its few identified regulatory mechanisms - intracortical inhibition and oscillatory markers - predict symptoms inconsistently. The prevailing view holds that pain results from reduced inhibition, a fixed deficit, rather than from resistance to inhibition that rehabilitation can reverse. Here we show that motor cortex pain compensation is instead a modifiable state whose analgesic efficiency depends on allostatic load. In a fibromyalgia trial and a knee osteoarthritis cohort assessed with parallel EEG and transcranial magnetic stimulation, a signature combining central theta asymmetry and intracortical inhibition was unrelated or inversely related to symptom burden under low allostatic load but positively related to it under high load in fibromyalgia, and its protective association was attenuated under high load in osteoarthritis - the same signal carrying different clinical meaning. A burden-adjusted index modelled on the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance was elevated under high load, predicted improvement after rehabilitation beyond baseline severity, and fell in responders but not in non-responders; in both cohorts the neurophysiological component itself recalibrated with response. Motor cortex compensation is thus degraded by allostatic load and restored by rehabilitation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.