ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
StaBLE: digital metrics capture balance performance across a wide spectrum of balance tasks and abilities.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Balance is fundamental to mobility and independence, yet it remains difficult to measure in a way that is both clinically meaningful and feasible for widespread adoption. There is a need for more quantitative, objective, and accessible balance assessments. To this end, we created the Stanford Balance Level Evaluation (StaBLE), a battery of 18 balance-challenging tasks and accompanying digital performance metrics computed from video that aimed to capture widely ranging balance abilities across 180 participants. We validated the StaBLE score against existing clinical scales and found that it correlated with age (ρ = -0.76, p<0.001), the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ρ = 0.60, p<0.001), a Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test task (τ=0.55, p<0.001), 4-Stage Balance Test (τ = 0.55, p<0.001), and Short Physical Performance Battery (τ =0.57, p<0.001). StaBLE overcame ceiling effects in these existing scales and had a different underlying distribution for those identified at risk of falling and not (KS: 0.67, p<0.001). To reduce the time it takes to perform the test, we identified subsets of balance tasks that best predicted the StaBLE score across different populations. Together, our dataset, balance assessment protocol, and performance-based score demonstrate the validity of digital measures of balance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.