ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Biophysical modeling reveals how recording geometry shapes representations of cortical activity.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular electrophysiological recordings reflect both the organization of neural activity and the geometry through which that activity is sampled. Here, we used biophysical modeling and experimental recordings from the macaque auditory cortex to determine how cortical activity is transformed across neural sources, extracellular signals, and recording geometries. In a biophysically detailed thalamocortical model, four separately instantiated cortical-column conditions spanning graded thalamic recruitment exhibited a graded response hierarchy across local field potential, current-source density, and multiunit activity, despite signal-dependent differences in the contributions of cortical neuronal populations. We then arranged independently simulated cortical columns into controlled spatial configurations and sampled the same underlying sources using virtual linear laminar and Directional and Scalable (DiSc) electrode arrays. The linear geometry primarily represented variation along cortical depth, whereas DiSc additionally represented circumferential variation associated with lateral source organization, demonstrating that recording geometry determines which spatial dimensions of common underlying activity are represented in extracellular measurements. Experimental recordings obtained with the corresponding geometries were consistent with these model-derived predictions: broadband-noise responses exhibited spatial organization shared across tone-evoked responses in both multidimensional DiSc maps and laminar profiles, despite substantial variation in frequency-dependent response magnitude across penetrations. Together, these results show that extracellular measurements represent an interaction between biological source organization and recording geometry. Biophysical forward modeling therefore provides a framework for determining which features of underlying circuit organization remain identifiable after extracellular sampling and for relating neural-interface design to the dimensions of cortical activity accessible experimentally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.