SynthesisF1000Research2026
Robotic Training and Neural Reorganization in Stroke: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Stroke is a primary contributor to global adult morbidity, frequently resulting in debilitating gait disturbances that impede independence. While standard neurorehabilitation remains essential, the advent of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) provides a platform for high-intensity, reproducible interventions designed to stimulate neuroplasticity. This systematic review evaluated the literature from 2015 to 2025 to determine the influence of RAGT on neural reorganization and functional outcomes in stroke survivors. Methodology: A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was performed for studies published between 2015 and 2025. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses investigating RAGT in acute, subacute, and chronic stroke patients. The evaluation metrics included clinical functional scales (e.g., the Berg Balance Scale and the 10-Meter Walk Test) and neurophysiological markers (e.g., fMRI, fNIRS, QEEG, and BDNF). Results: Analysis of 23 randomized trials and multiple meta-analyses indicated that RAGT combined with conventional therapy yielded significant improvements in gait speed (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.47) and balance (mean difference [MD] = 4.58). Neuroimaging revealed increased activation of the primary motor cortex and supplementary motor areas. Electrophysiological data confirmed reductions in the Power Ratio Index, suggesting normalized cortical activity. End-effector systems have demonstrated superior efficacy in the subacute phase compared to exoskeletons. Conclusion: RAGT serves as a potent driver of cortical and spinal neuroplasticity by facilitating high-repetition task-specific stimuli. Early intervention during the subacute phase maximizes functional recovery. Future research should prioritize standardizing the dosing and longitudinal monitoring of neural connectivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.