ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2026
Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Knee Cartilage for Detection of Early Osteoarthritis and Prediction of Radiographic Progression.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe progression of early osteoarthritis (OA) is difficult to predict radiographically. T2 mapping provides information about cartilage degeneration, but its sensitivity to early matrix injury is limited. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) may detect cartilage microstructural abnormalities beyond T2 mapping. PURPOSE: To test whether baseline cartilage DTI metrics are associated with early knee OA and 3-year radiographic progression, and to compare their performance with T2 mapping and baseline Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS). STUDY TYPE: Prospective longitudinal cohort. POPULATION: Seventy-one participants (40 female, 31 male): 60 with unilateral symptomatic OA (one knee Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] ≥ 2, contralateral KL = 1) and 11 asymptomatic controls; 40 OA participants had 3-year follow-up radiographs. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T, radial spin-echo diffusion (RAISED) DTI and multi-echo spin-echo T2 mapping. ASSESSMENT: KL grade, joint space width, baseline WORMS, and cartilage segmentations were obtained. Mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity (RD), and T2 were calculated in six cartilage regions. Progression was defined as joint space narrowing (JSN) > 0.7 mm or any KL grade increase. STATISTICAL TESTS: ANCOVA adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. Discrimination was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC); predictive models were evaluated using cross-validated AUC. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsBaseline medial femoral condyle (MFC) MD distinguished KL = 0 from KL ≥ 1 knees (AUC 0.90), whereas a T2-based model showed lower discrimination (AUC 0.55). Among KL = 1 knees, 30% showed JSN progression and 28% KL progression. Baseline MFC MD and RD were higher in progressors, and adding MFC MD improved prediction of radiographic progression (AUC 0.80 for JSN and 0.71 for KL). DATA
conclusionBaseline cartilage DTI, particularly MFC MD, showed stronger associations with early knee OA and radiographic progression than T2 mapping. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.