ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Probability-Driven Adaptive Foot-Mounted Inertial Navigation with Local Straight-Heading and Stair-Height Constraints.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Foot-mounted inertial pedestrian navigation is an attractive infrastructure-free solution for pedestrian positioning in environments where Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals are unavailable, degraded, or intentionally excluded. However, mixed-gait and multi-level motion expose two persistent failure modes: unreliable zero-velocity detection during high-dynamic motion and weak yaw observability after standard zero-velocity-aided filtering. This paper presents a probability-driven adaptive foot-mounted inertial navigation framework that couples a lightweight motion-probability front-end with probability-weighted mode-adaptive zero-velocity detection, local straight-heading constraints, and probability-gated stair-height updates. A 335-dimensional motion-feature LightGBM classifier first outputs six gait probabilities from 128-sample windows of six-axis inertial data. These probabilities continuously determine the zero-velocity detector threshold and the reliability of heading and vertical pseudo-measurements. For planar navigation, a motion-aware local straight-heading constraint (MA-LSHC) establishes local reference headings only over curvature-safe straight segments, and an adaptive heading covariance controls the strength of each heading pseudo-measurement. For stair navigation, height changes are quantized into integer-riser increments only when stair probabilities and vertical inertial evidence agree. All data were collected in outdoor pedestrian environments, and the evaluation includes four parts: motion classification, training and detector diagnostics, closed rectangular planar navigation, and multi-level stair-height reconstruction. The motion-feature classifier achieves 96.24% accuracy and 96.17% macro-F1. In a mixed-gait closed rectangular route, the proposed method obtains a 1.09 m closure error and a 0.68% relative closure error, outperforming fixed SHOE-ESKF, Wang-AWGF, Guo-SIHDC, and Deng-HDR baselines. In stair experiments, the proposed method achieves a grid-node RMSE of 0.13 m and correctly identifies 38 ascending and 38 descending risers. These results demonstrate that motion probabilities can be used not merely as labels, but as continuous reliability cues for adaptive inertial constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.