ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Mobile-Master-Vehicle-Based LiDAR Perception and Centralized Control of Sensor-Light Slave Vehicles.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an asymmetric cooperative perception-and-control architecture in which a sensor-rich mobile master vehicle performs external perception, state estimation, motion planning, and path-tracking control for sensor-light slave vehicles. The proposed vehicle-model-aided LiDAR tracking (VMALT) method combines ego-motion-compensated LiDAR measurements with transmitted speed and steering commands through a kinematic bicycle model. In physical-vehicle experiments, VMALT reduced the slave-position RMSE from 0.36 m with a LiDAR-only constant-velocity Kalman filter to 0.32 m, corresponding to an 11.1% improvement. The estimated state was subsequently used for closed-loop speed and path-tracking control of the physical slave vehicle. Scalability was evaluated using a one-master-two-slave configuration over three separate runs comprising circular and linear paths and geometrically identified line-of-sight-overlap candidates. Concurrent two-target LiDAR availability ranged from 96.465% to 99.934%, with a maximum interior observation gap of 0.10 s. The VMALT trajectories expressed in the GPS coordinate frame followed the position and direction of both slave vehicles, with heading RMSEs ranging from 1.835∘ to 4.609∘. In an LTE-tethering communication test, all 2400 UDP packets were returned, with median and 99th-percentile round-trip times of 4.654 and 8.220 ms, respectively. These results demonstrate the feasibility of centralized perception and control for multiple sensor-light vehicles under the evaluated low-speed operating conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.