ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Symmetric Bidirectional Soft Rotary Actuator with a Bendable Shaft Driven by Extension-Type Pneumatic Actuators.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soft actuators capable of flexible motion have been actively studied and developed. Soft actuators that can extend and bend have been developed; however, soft rotary actuators have rarely been reported. In our previous studies, a soft rotary actuator (SRA) that generates rotational motion by constraining extension-type soft actuators (EFPAs) in a spiral shape was developed. However, the SRA had the limitation of rotating only in one direction, either clockwise or counterclockwise. In this paper, we aim to develop a symmetric bidirectional soft rotary actuator (SB-SRA) that achieves comparable rotational performance in both clockwise and counterclockwise directions while maintaining the flexibility of polymeric materials, such as rubber, and allowing static hysteresis adjustment. In particular, arranging several EFPAs so that they do not interfere with each other during extension enables the SRA to generate both clockwise and counterclockwise rotational motion. Unlike previously reported unidirectional soft rotary actuators, and unlike rigid antagonistic bidirectional joints that require bearings and a dedicated brake, the proposed SB-SRA achieves symmetric bidirectional rotation with a bendable rotational axis and enables static hysteresis compensation using only the opposing actuators. The results show that the maximum rotation angle and torque of the SB-SRA are approximately 105° and 0.51 Nm, respectively, under an input pressure of 500 kPa. The maximum directional differences between clockwise and counterclockwise operation were 3.3% for the rotation angle and 2.4% for the torque, demonstrating approximately symmetric output characteristics. In addition, static hysteresis adjustment can be achieved by varying the supply pressures applied to the opposing EFPAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.