ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Unified Semantic Reasoning and Planning for Autonomous Driving.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The conventional autonomy stack layers separate representations, leaving a vertical gap between high-level semantic reasoning and low-level trajectory generation. This paper closes that gap by carrying a single Triplet Ontological Semantic Model (TOSM) representation across the stack. A standardized high-definition (HD) map is first lifted into a TOSM-based semantic HD map with symbolic, explicit, and implicit attributes. Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) rules then infer context-appropriate maneuvers such as yielding, stopping, and lane changing. The inferred state is translated automatically into a Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) mission plan, and the same representation drives a Gaussian-process factor-graph optimizer that produces a smooth, kinematically feasible trajectory. The optimizer reuses the incremental factor graph of the localization layer, and semantic lane and interaction factors tie the trajectory directly to the map. Reasoning, planning, and optimization therefore share one interpretable representation, and every inferred maneuver remains traceable to the trajectory that realizes it. The rule base is logically consistent and agrees with an independent description-logic reasoner. In a closed-loop drive-along on urban routes, the optimizer tracks the routed lane far more tightly than a diverse set of baselines while remaining smooth and feasible. An open-loop evaluation on real driving data recorded in Busan, Republic of Korea, reproduces this advantage against an untuned continuous-optimization baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.