Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42817519›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Review of Multi-Scale Bridge Monitoring: An Information-Centric Framework Integrating Ground-Penetrating Radar, Distributed Optical-Fibre Sensing, and Satellite Remote Sensing for Bridge Digital Twins.

Lilong Zou, Ying Li, Kevin Munisami, Giovanni Nico, Amir M Alani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lilong ZouFaculty of Engineering, Computing and the Environment, Kingston University, London KT1 1LQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5109-4866
Ying LiSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK.ORCID 0009-0000-2643-733X
Kevin MunisamiFaculty of Engineering, Computing and the Environment, Kingston University, London KT1 1LQ, UK.
Giovanni NicoIstituto per le Applicazioni del Calcolo (IAC), Consiglio Nazionale dele Ricerche (CNR), 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7621-5014
Amir M AlaniFaculty of Engineering, Computing and the Environment, Kingston University, London KT1 1LQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bridge infrastructure worldwide is under increasing pressure from ageing assets, growing traffic demand, environmental deterioration, and the need for more effective lifecycle management. Although bridge-monitoring technologies have developed rapidly, much of the existing research has focused on individual sensing techniques, while the integration of heterogeneous information across different spatial scales has received comparatively less attention. This review takes an information-centric perspective on intelligent bridge monitoring and focuses on three representative technologies that provide complementary information at the material, structural, and network scales: Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) for assessing material condition, distributed optical-fibre sensing (DOFS) for monitoring structural response, and satellite remote sensing for providing network-scale information. Instead of comparing these technologies solely for their sensing principles, the review considers their complementary roles in bridge engineering and proposes a Material-Structural-Network (M-S-N) framework to organise monitoring information across scales. Recent developments in multi-source information fusion, AI-based interpretation, connected monitoring systems, autonomous monitoring, and self-evolving Digital Twins are also reviewed. Together, these advances indicate a shift from simply collecting monitoring data towards integrating information, extracting engineering knowledge, and supporting intelligent decisions. Based on this perspective, a Multi-Scale Integration Framework is proposed to illustrate how observations at different scales can be combined to provide a more complete understanding of bridge condition, structural performance, and infrastructure-network context. Future bridge monitoring should therefore move beyond isolated sensing and data collection towards multi-scale information generation and integration, supporting predictive maintenance, resilient asset management, and intelligent lifecycle decision-making across bridge networks.

Indexed as

bridge monitoringdigital twindistributed optical-fibre sensingground-penetrating radarmulti-scale monitoringmulti-source information fusionsatellite remote sensing

Identifiers

PMID42817519
PMCPMC13611653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.