ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
I-GraphECG: Observability-Based Lead Selection and Interpretable Disease Prediction from the 12-Lead ECG Using a Gray-Box Graph Electrophysiology Surrogate.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable ECG increasingly records fewer than the standard 12 leads, so a model must be accurate, interpretable, and explicit about the information lost under lead reduction. I-GraphECG is a gray-box graph electrophysiology surrogate: an encoder maps a 12-lead median beat to a bounded vector of 47 equivalent electrophysiological descriptors, a constrained eight-node conduction-graph decoder reconstructs the signal, and disease prediction uses the descriptors rather than the waveform. On a clean PTB-XL four-class subset, median beats are reconstructed at median correlation 0.91, and macro-AUROC reaches ≈0.90, near the black-box references (0.920-0.924). Myocardial infarction is under-detected (recall ≈ 0.49), consistent with the ST-source's low observability, so the model must not be used as a stand-alone rule-out for infarction. Observability-based sensor selection makes explicit what each lead set can resolve: lead removal provably cannot lower any Cramér-Rao bound; under the data-derived noise models, every optimal three-lead set retains one of the precordial leads V2-V5, and the conventional reduced set is never observability-optimal across seven noise models, though the exact montage is noise-model-dependent. Reconstruction and the observability analysis of the fixed model transfer zero-shot to US and Chinese cohorts; parameter-only disease prediction degrades externally, and infarction, untestable in those cohorts, remains internally demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.