ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Source-Free Class-Balanced Pseudo-Label Adaptation for Large-Scale Cross-Day WiFi Transmitter Identification.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radio-frequency (RF) fingerprint distributions vary across collection dates, and changes in propagation conditions and hardware states can degrade transmitter-identification performance. To address this issue, we propose Source-Free Class-Balanced Pseudo-Label Adaptation (SF-CBPA) for cross-day WiFi transmitter identification. SF-CBPA requires only an unlabeled target-day dataset and a pretrained source model. It recalibrates batch-normalization statistics, freezes the source classifier, and uses Sinkhorn-balanced pseudo-labeling with within-class confidence selection; an exponential-moving-average teacher and information maximization provide auxiliary stabilization. Experiments were carried out using the public WiSig-ManyTx subset with 140 transmitters and one fixed receiver. The first three collection days trained the source model, while Day 4 provided 25 unlabeled adaptation samples and 25 independent test samples per class. Across three random seeds, SF-CBPA achieved 63.80 ± 0.90% accuracy and 0.6330 ± 0.0121 Macro-F1. A protocol-aligned SHOT implementation achieved 61.72 ± 1.95% accuracy and 0.5963 ± 0.0285 Macro-F1, while source-only and TENT-style achieved 57.93 ± 0.58% and 58.58 ± 0.43% accuracy, respectively. Direct analysis shows that Sinkhorn reduced the hard pseudo-label count range from 1-54 to 13-35 and the class-count standard deviation from 11.75 to 3.42. Component-isolated ablation identifies Sinkhorn balancing as the principal contributor under seed 123; the independent benefits of EMA and the auxiliary information-maximization term are small or inconsistent. These conclusions are restricted to the balanced, closed-set, fixed-receiver protocol evaluated here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.