ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Data-Efficient EEG-Based Person Identification via Time-Interval-Based Multi-Positive Contrastive Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) is an emerging biometric trait because it is difficult to steal or forge and requires acquisition from living subjects. However, many EEG-based person identification methods rely on large enrollment datasets, increasing acquisition burden and limiting practical deployment. To address this issue, we propose a data-efficient person identification framework based on time-interval-based multi-positive contrastive learning (TIB-MPCL). For each one-second EEG segment, overlapping, adjacent, and non-adjacent positive samples are constructed to exploit temporal diversity. These samples are jointly optimized through contrastive learning, together with an alignment module that promotes intra-subject compactness and inter-subject separability. Experiments on the 109-subject PhysioNet dataset demonstrate strong performance under both sufficient- and limited-sample conditions. TIB-MPCL achieves an average accuracy of 99.05% using all available training samples and 83.86% using only 10 one-second samples per subject, with accuracies above 91% for motor execution and imagery. Cross-session experiments on SEED-IV further evaluate robustness to session-dependent variability, achieving an average accuracy of 83.79% when the test session is completely excluded from training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.