ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Dynamic Bending Response and Durability of a DSTT-Fabricated MWCNT-Coated Cotton Fabric Sensor.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable textile sensors must maintain a stable electrical response during repeated bending and across different bending speeds encountered in wearable use. Here, a multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)-coated cotton fabric fabricated by the drop-casting, sonication, and thermal treatment (DSTT) method was evaluated as a piezoresistive bending sensor against a room-temperature-dried (RT) control at the same coating cycle. The DSTT sensor retained 89.2% of its peak response after 1000 continuous bending cycles, compared with 20.0% for the RT control. Across sequential tests at 1, 2, 4, and 8 mm/s, the DSTT mean peak response varied by 11.1% of the grand mean while maintaining regular waveforms and baseline recovery. Carriage-separation testing gave an average regression sensitivity of approximately 0.58%/mm (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.