ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Nurses' Career Progression and Career Success: A Scoping Review of Conceptualisation and Associated Workforce Conditions.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConceptual inconsistency exists in nursing literature, with career progression, career advancement, career success, professional development and career fulfilment defined and applied in varying ways. This ambiguity blurs important distinctions and limits the comparison and interpretation of findings. This scoping review mapped how career progression and career success have been conceptualised and measured and synthesised the organisational and workforce factors reported in relation to these outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science were searched. Data were charted and synthesised using a descriptive thematic approach. Reporting followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews.
resultsOf 2504 records identified, 20 studies were included. Studies included qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method designs. Career progression was represented by movement through grades, roles or responsibilities, whereas objective career success concerned observable achievements and subjective career success concerned personal evaluations of achievement, recognition or fulfilment. Professional development, identity, belonging and intention to remain were related constructs rather than interchangeable outcomes. Reported factors were organised into five descriptive themes: organisational career infrastructure; leadership and managerial conditions; workforce environment; social and relational conditions; and individual resources and career behaviours.
conclusionThe literature reports relationships between career-related outcomes and conditions at individual, relational, organisational and workforce levels, but it does not establish causal or hierarchical effects. Conceptual inconsistency, contextual heterogeneity and the absence of prospective longitudinal and intervention evidence restrict causal interpretation and transferability. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Findings support consideration of transparent career pathways, equitable access to development, recognition of prior expertise, supportive career conversations and adequate practice environments. These approaches may be considered within local workforce systems but require prospective evaluation because direct evidence that they improve career progression, retention or workforce sustainability remains limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.