Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42817430›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Quality-Aware AIoT-Enabled Wireless Urban Sensor Networks Using Deep Learning.

Carrow Morris-Wiltshire, Stuart Barr, Phil James, Tom Komar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carrow Morris-WiltshireSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-4503-4000
Stuart BarrSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0433-5188
Phil JamesSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9248-0280
Tom KomarSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-3280-987X

Funding

Defence Science and Technology Laboratory RES/0539/7397/009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between data quality and deep learning model performance for predicting pedestrian flows in smart cities, using data from the UK's Newcastle Urban Observatory. We evaluate eight forecasting models (including multivariate LSTMs and Transformers) across 110 pedestrian sensors. Crucially, by preserving genuine data gaps, we reveal that the structure of missing data-specifically the length of consecutive sequences-is a more significant determinant of model performance than overall data completeness. Segmented regression identifies a sharp breakpoint at three hours of average sequence length, below which forecast error deteriorates rapidly. After controlling for sequence length, data completeness has no independent predictive power. Multivariate LSTMs and Transformers outperform all baselines, with Diebold-Mariano tests confirming statistical significance. A random forest meta-model successfully predicts per-sensor error (R2=0.81) using basic quality metrics, highlighting sequence fragmentation as the dominant predictor. Finally, we show that sensors in transit-dense urban cores exhibit stronger diurnal signals and lower relative error, acting as spatial proxies for data quality. These findings establish key data quality requirements for forecasting urban dynamics and provide a framework for robust, quality-aware predictive systems.

Indexed as

AIoTdata qualitydeep learningintelligent sensing systemsmovement predictionpedestrian monitoringwireless sensor networks

Identifiers

PMID42817430
PMCPMC13611587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.