Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42817427›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Calibrated Post-Processing Layer for Tolerance-Compliant Crack-Width Measurement.

Ishan Hrishikesh Pradhan, Rodrigo Sarlo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ishan Hrishikesh PradhanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-6615-1501
Rodrigo SarloDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2877-9506

Funding

New Mexico Department of Transportation C06421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crack width governs how inspectors rate and prioritize concrete deterioration, yet automated pipelines are still judged by pixel-overlap scores (IoU, Dice) that do not explicitly target width measurement. We show geometrically that high pixel overlap can coexist with substantial width error and experimentally demonstrate a systematic over-segmentation bias across modern crack-segmentation algorithms. We present Parallel Consensus Fusion (PCF), a deliberately lightweight measurement-reliability layer, applicable to any algorithm whose operating point over-segments, that corrects this bias by intersecting the learned mask with an independently derived contrast-enhanced threshold mask; its few parameters are fixed once per algorithm and domain through a coverage-constrained calibration rather than assumed universal. Evaluated across ten segmentation algorithms on an uncontrolled field set (75 caliper-measured physical regions of interest, ROIs, on 15 cracks, imaged at three distances for 225 image-ROI observations) and an external dataset of 19,098 width-labeled ROIs, PCF behaves as a calibrated over-segmentation corrector whose benefit is predictable from each algorithm's over-segmentation bias. It raises the

Indexed as

calibrationcrack-width measurementimage segmentationinfrastructure inspectionmeasurement reliabilityover-segmentation correctionwithin-tolerance ROI rate

Identifiers

PMID42817427
PMCPMC13611813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.