ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Privacy-Preserving Detection of Post-Fall Lying Posture Using a Low-Resolution Infrared Sensor and an Edge FOMO Neural Network.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Falls in older adults are a leading cause of injury, and the time spent on the floor afterwards is the stronger predictor of outcome. We present a low-cost system that detects the sustained lying posture following a fall. An FLIR Lepton 3.1R (160 × 120 px) and an int8-quantized FOMO detector run fully on an OpenMV RT1062 board; no image data leaves the node. Ten healthy adults, none in the training data, followed a structured posture protocol, yielding 3034 labelled frames. No fall, real or simulated, was recorded: lying is a proxy for a post-fall state, and claims are restricted accordingly. The detector produced an output on only 66.3% of labelled frames, with a strong class dependence (75.6% lying, 51.7% standing). End-to-end, binary lying-posture recognition reached a sensitivity of 0.723 (95% CI 0.637-0.812) and an F1 of 0.801. Every sustained lying bout of at least 20 s was flagged, but the deployed alert rule also produced roughly one hundred false alerts per hour of non-lying activity. Low-resolution thermal sensing is therefore a workable basis for long-lie detection; the limiting factors are the detector's class-dependent miss rate and the alert logic, not the posture classifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.