Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42817424›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Impact of Environmental Conditions on YOLOv8-Based Traffic Sign Detection: A Controlled Comparison of Simulated and Real Weather Cases.

Ziyad N Aldoski, Csaba Koren, Daniel Miletics

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ziyad N AldoskiDepartment of Highway and Bridge, Technical College of Engineering, Duhok Polytechnic University, 61 Zakho Road, Duhok 1006, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-3362-7657
Csaba KorenDepartment of Transport Infrastructure and Water Resources Engineering, Széchenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, 9026 Győr, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1034-0557
Daniel MileticsDepartment of Transport Infrastructure and Water Resources Engineering, Széchenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, 9026 Győr, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9073-4072

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust traffic sign detection is essential for reliable autonomous driving systems; however, detection performance can be substantially affected by adverse environmental conditions. Although simulation-based approaches are widely used to evaluate robustness, the extent to which simulated weather reproduces real-world environmental effects remains insufficiently understood. This study presents a controlled, comparative evaluation methodology for assessing a YOLOv8-based traffic sign detection model across four environmental conditions: clear (sunny), simulated rain, real-world rain, and simulated snow. The same road segment, camera configuration, and predefined set of 55 traffic-sign instances were maintained across the evaluated conditions, enabling interpretable comparisons while minimizing scene-level variability. Detection performance was assessed using representative detection confidence (RDC) at the traffic-sign-instance level, along with image-quality metrics such as sharpness, saturation, and intensity. Mean RDC was highest under clear conditions (0.825), followed descriptively by simulated snow (0.647), real-world rain (0.408), and simulated rain (0.395). However, simulated and real-world rain did not differ significantly in RDC (Holm-adjusted

Indexed as

autonomous vehicleenvironmental robustnessrepresentative detection confidenceroad safetytraffic sign detectionweather simulationYOLOv8

Identifiers

PMID42817424
PMCPMC13611514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.