ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Exposure-Midpoint Temporal Alignment and Risk-Aware Adaptive Feature Tracking for Stereo Visual-Inertial Odometry.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual-inertial odometry (VIO) on industrial stereo camera-IMU platforms suffers from frame-dependent timing errors and degraded feature tracking under auto-exposure, auto-gain adjustment, and rapid motion. This paper presents Hardware-Synchronized Exposure-State-Aware VINS-Fusion (HS-ES-VINS), a hardware-synchronized, exposure-aware extension of VINS-Fusion. The effective sampling time of each global-shutter image is reconstructed at the exposure midpoint using synchronized trigger timestamps, the camera debounce delay, and the frame-wise exposure duration. An exposure-gain-motion risk model adaptively adjusts feature detection criteria, Kanade-Lucas-Tomasi (KLT) tracking parameters, and correspondence filtering, while IMU-integrated rotation supplies initial predictions for feature tracking. On hardware-synchronized indoor and outdoor datasets with independent ground truth, controlled experiments show that the exposure-midpoint timestamp removes the frame-dependent exposure component of the camera-IMU offset that neither fixed nor online scalar compensation can remove, reducing the ATE RMSE by 28.6% (fixed offset) and 22.7% (online estimation) relative to the exposure-start timestamp under 20 ms low-light exposure. Compared with baseline VINS-Fusion, the complete adaptive front end reduces the ATE RMSE by 16.8% and 12.9% on indoor multi-floor and outdoor cycling sequences, and the risk score explains frame-wise tracking quality (correlation of 0.587 with the inlier ratio). The front end runs faster than the baseline (17.1 ms per frame), confirming real-time operation and improved robustness against variable illumination and rapid motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.