ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Truck Cargo Load Change Detection: Depth Map Normalization and 1D Projection Matching.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cargo-fall accidents caused by improper cargo loading have frequently occurred on highways in recent years, posing a growing threat to driver safety. Because enforcement typically relies on fixed inspection stations, some drivers illegally alter their cargo loads between checkpoints to evade overload inspections, and such changes are rarely secured properly, further increasing the risk of cargo-fall accidents. Current cargo inspection systems, however, are largely limited to labor-intensive manual checks or weight-based sensors that cannot distinguish between items of comparable weight. This paper presents an approach that detects cargo load changes on trucks by comparing depth maps acquired through a stereo vision system across consecutive passes. The proposed approach normalizes the raw depth map to correct for perspective distortion and aligns the current and previous cargo-bed regions through one-dimensional projection matching, enabling accurate comparison independent of cargo color or texture. We validate the approach through field experiments at SMTB under two test scenarios, one with uniform cargo items and one with diverse, irregularly placed items, and benchmark it against four widely used alignment algorithms: SIFT, ORB, AKAZE, and XFeat. The proposed algorithm reaches a combined detection rate of 91.49% (43/47), well above every conventional algorithm, at a processing speed nearly on par with ORB, the fastest of the compared methods. Notably, all four conventional algorithms consistently miss the same subset of events involving a tarpaulin, whose color and texture closely resemble the cargo bed, whereas the depth-based approach detects these events without difficulty. These findings offer practical guidance for building more reliable, real-world cargo load change detection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.