ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An Adaptive IMU-Visual Multimodal Fusion System for Real-Time Exercise Recognition and Movement Quality Assessment.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exercise recognition and movement quality assessment remain challenging in supervised exercise training, particularly under viewpoint changes and self-occlusion. Vision-based methods provide spatial posture information but are susceptible to keypoint loss, whereas inertial sensing is less affected by occlusion but provides limited information about global posture geometry. This study presents a dual-stream prototype that combines a nine-axis inertial measurement unit (IMU) with vision-based pose estimation. A 1DCNN-LSTM branch models inertial dynamics, a custom keypoint temporal branch models normalized pose sequences, and a confidence-gated rule adjusts their contributions according to visual keypoint reliability. Owing to the absence of a public synchronized multi-view IMU-vision exercise dataset with the required protocol, we constructed IMV-Exercise, comprising 10 participants, three exercises, and 900 repetition-level samples with side-, front-, and posterior-view recordings. The system achieved 96.0% exercise recognition accuracy under leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. In a separate viewpoint-specific evaluation, the fused output achieved 91.2% action-window accuracy under posterior viewing. Across 50 online trials, the reported recognition accuracy was 96.0%, the mean end-to-end latency was 195 ms, and the recorded maximum was below 210 ms. These results establish feasibility within the studied cohort and exercises; broader generalization and feedback effectiveness require larger, independently controlled evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.