Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42817415›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

An Adaptive IMU-Visual Multimodal Fusion System for Real-Time Exercise Recognition and Movement Quality Assessment.

Zhaoyang Gu, Ruopeng Yang, Yongqi Shi, Dongxu Dai, Chaoyang Li, Bo Huang, Kaige Jiao, Yu Tao, Yongqi Wen, Yihao Zhong and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhaoyang GuGraduate School, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.ORCID 0009-0000-3991-0253
Ruopeng YangDepartment of Information and Communication Command, PLA Information Support Force Engineering University, Wuhan 430000, China.
Yongqi ShiGraduate School, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Dongxu DaiDepartment of Information and Communication Command, PLA Information Support Force Engineering University, Wuhan 430000, China.
Chaoyang LiGraduate School, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.ORCID 0009-0006-2079-1972
Bo HuangDepartment of Information and Communication Command, PLA Information Support Force Engineering University, Wuhan 430000, China.ORCID 0009-0000-6229-9587
Kaige JiaoGraduate School, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Yu TaoDepartment of Information and Communication Command, PLA Information Support Force Engineering University, Wuhan 430000, China.
Yongqi WenGraduate School, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Yihao ZhongGraduate School, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Chen HeGraduate School, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise recognition and movement quality assessment remain challenging in supervised exercise training, particularly under viewpoint changes and self-occlusion. Vision-based methods provide spatial posture information but are susceptible to keypoint loss, whereas inertial sensing is less affected by occlusion but provides limited information about global posture geometry. This study presents a dual-stream prototype that combines a nine-axis inertial measurement unit (IMU) with vision-based pose estimation. A 1DCNN-LSTM branch models inertial dynamics, a custom keypoint temporal branch models normalized pose sequences, and a confidence-gated rule adjusts their contributions according to visual keypoint reliability. Owing to the absence of a public synchronized multi-view IMU-vision exercise dataset with the required protocol, we constructed IMV-Exercise, comprising 10 participants, three exercises, and 900 repetition-level samples with side-, front-, and posterior-view recordings. The system achieved 96.0% exercise recognition accuracy under leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. In a separate viewpoint-specific evaluation, the fused output achieved 91.2% action-window accuracy under posterior viewing. Across 50 online trials, the reported recognition accuracy was 96.0%, the mean end-to-end latency was 195 ms, and the recorded maximum was below 210 ms. These results establish feasibility within the studied cohort and exercises; broader generalization and feedback effectiveness require larger, independently controlled evaluations.

Indexed as

ExerciseAlgorithmsHumansMovementPostureexercise recognitioninertial measurement unitmovement quality assessmentmultimodal fusionreal-time corrective feedbackvision-based pose estimation

Identifiers

PMID42817415
PMCPMC13611031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.