SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Towards Acoustic Bioindicator Integration in AI-Based Wildfire Monitoring: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wildfires are becoming more frequent, severe, and long-lasting, driving rapid growth in sensor-based and artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled systems for early detection and risk assessment. This article presents a systematic literature review, based on 169 studies screened from 7511 records, of wildfire monitoring approaches using satellite and aerial remote sensing, fixed cameras, wireless sensor networks, and Internet of Things (IoT) platforms combined with machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for ignition detection, fire-weather indices, spread prediction, and burned-area mapping. The review organizes existing work by sensing modality, spatial and temporal scale, learning task, model type, and deployment architecture, and identifies the environmental drivers most commonly used across systems, including temperature, humidity, vegetation state, drought indices, and smoke or air quality. Based on this analysis, the review summarizes key technical challenges, including data sparsity in remote regions, high false-alarm rates, limited edge resources, and difficulty fusing heterogeneous data streams in real time. As an exploratory future direction, the review discusses bioindicator signals from wildlife and managed species, using honeybee colonies as a case example. Current bee bioacoustic studies support the detection of colony states and environmental stress proxies, but they do not yet validate wildfire or smoke detection. Therefore, this review proposes bee bioacoustics only as a potential complementary contextual signal for future hybrid wildfire monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.