Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42817391›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

An Adaptive Smoothing-Constrained Broad Learning System for Truck-Scale Weighing.

Jing Ling, Jinru Li, Zhimin Wang, Haijun Lin, Dan Xiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing LingSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Guangzhou Maritime University, Guangzhou 510725, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9163-2542
Jinru LiSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China.
Zhimin WangSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China.
Haijun LinCollege of Engineering and Design, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Dan XiangSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Guangzhou Maritime University, Guangzhou 510725, China.

Funding

Department of Education of Guangdong Province Grant No. 2025GXJK0504Department of Education of Guangdong Province Grant No. 2025ZDJS129Guangzhou Education Bureau Grant No. 2024312026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As core weighing equipment in the logistics and industrial sectors, the accuracy of truck scales is significantly affected by environmental noise, sensor errors, and nonlinear factors. This paper proposes an adaptive smoothing-constrained broad learning system (PSO-MCC-SCBLS) to enhance the precision and robustness of truck-scale weighing. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is employed to optimize the number of feature windows, feature nodes, enhancement nodes, and the smoothing coefficient of the SCBLS; the maximum correntropy criterion (MCC) replaces the minimum mean square error (MMSE) criterion for training the output-weight matrix; and a smoothing constraint derived from the physical continuity of the weighing system is introduced to improve generalization in small-sample scenarios. The method was validated on real data from an 8-channel, 40-ton truck scale under a corrected evaluation protocol that uses group-wise five-fold cross-validation, selects all hyperparameters by an inner cross-validation on the training folds only, and matches the effective regularization strength across MCC and non-MCC variants. A complete component ablation over the seven BLS-family variants (BLS, MCC-BLS, SCBLS, PSO-BLS, PSO-SCBLS, PSO-MCC-BLS and the full model) is reported alongside RBLS, CatBoost, CNN_Attention and LSTM, together with anti-interference tests under a composite Gaussian-plus-impulsive disturbance injected in three scenarios: disturbed calibration only (A), disturbed calibration and deployment (B), and disturbed deployment only (C). The results delimit the contribution of each component. Automated structural search is the one component whose benefit is large and consistent, reducing clean-data RMSE by 47.7% over a plain BLS. On clean data the full model does not lead: PSO-MCC-BLS attains the lowest RMSE (0.0209×103 kg) while the full model records 0.0292×103 kg, indicating that under a leakage-free protocol this calibration task is already close to a low-complexity regime. The advantage of the full model is specific and is reported as such: in Scenario B at a noise ratio of 0.5 it achieves the lowest RMSE (1.7670×103 kg) and the best Friedman rank among all eleven models (p<0.05), whereas at the weaker intensity and in Scenario C the deep-learning baselines lead. Once the effective regularization is matched, the MCC term contributes negligibly on this dataset, so the observed robustness is attributable to the tuned BLS-family model as a whole rather than to correntropy weighting in isolation.

Indexed as

broad learning systemerror compensationmaximum correntropy criterionsmoothness constrainttruck scale

Identifiers

PMID42817391
PMCPMC13611440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.