ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An Adaptive Smoothing-Constrained Broad Learning System for Truck-Scale Weighing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As core weighing equipment in the logistics and industrial sectors, the accuracy of truck scales is significantly affected by environmental noise, sensor errors, and nonlinear factors. This paper proposes an adaptive smoothing-constrained broad learning system (PSO-MCC-SCBLS) to enhance the precision and robustness of truck-scale weighing. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is employed to optimize the number of feature windows, feature nodes, enhancement nodes, and the smoothing coefficient of the SCBLS; the maximum correntropy criterion (MCC) replaces the minimum mean square error (MMSE) criterion for training the output-weight matrix; and a smoothing constraint derived from the physical continuity of the weighing system is introduced to improve generalization in small-sample scenarios. The method was validated on real data from an 8-channel, 40-ton truck scale under a corrected evaluation protocol that uses group-wise five-fold cross-validation, selects all hyperparameters by an inner cross-validation on the training folds only, and matches the effective regularization strength across MCC and non-MCC variants. A complete component ablation over the seven BLS-family variants (BLS, MCC-BLS, SCBLS, PSO-BLS, PSO-SCBLS, PSO-MCC-BLS and the full model) is reported alongside RBLS, CatBoost, CNN_Attention and LSTM, together with anti-interference tests under a composite Gaussian-plus-impulsive disturbance injected in three scenarios: disturbed calibration only (A), disturbed calibration and deployment (B), and disturbed deployment only (C). The results delimit the contribution of each component. Automated structural search is the one component whose benefit is large and consistent, reducing clean-data RMSE by 47.7% over a plain BLS. On clean data the full model does not lead: PSO-MCC-BLS attains the lowest RMSE (0.0209×103 kg) while the full model records 0.0292×103 kg, indicating that under a leakage-free protocol this calibration task is already close to a low-complexity regime. The advantage of the full model is specific and is reported as such: in Scenario B at a noise ratio of 0.5 it achieves the lowest RMSE (1.7670×103 kg) and the best Friedman rank among all eleven models (p<0.05), whereas at the weaker intensity and in Scenario C the deep-learning baselines lead. Once the effective regularization is matched, the MCC term contributes negligibly on this dataset, so the observed robustness is attributable to the tuned BLS-family model as a whole rather than to correntropy weighting in isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.