ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multisensor Localization and Risk-Aware Navigation for Underwater Robots in Turbid and Confined Inland Waters: A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inland waters such as lakes, reservoirs, rivers, fish ponds, and confined hydraulic structures impose turbidity, shallow-water acoustic multipath, dense boundaries, dynamic biological interference, and limited communication on underwater robots. These coupled constraints can simultaneously degrade sensing, localization, mapping, planning, and control. This structured narrative review synthesizes peer-reviewed English-language evidence on underwater navigation, with emphasis on multisensor fusion localization and the transfer of localization uncertainty into risk-aware planning. Visual, acoustic, inertial, velocity, depth, and external positioning measurements are compared by complementarity, observability, degradation modes, and integration cost. Filtering, sliding-window optimization, factor graphs, estimator switching, and hybrid model- and data-driven approaches are evaluated according to accuracy, real-time performance, robustness, and localization credibility. The review examines how covariance, sensing quality, collision probability, energy, platform dynamics, and task requirements affect maps, path costs, safety margins, trajectory tracking, and degraded operation. Evidence from simulation, public datasets, hardware-in-the-loop tests, tanks, and real waters is synthesized conditionally because study platforms, environments, ground truth, and metrics are heterogeneous. Reliable inland-water autonomy requires diagnosable heterogeneous sensing, integrity-aware localization, and coordinated feedback among localization, planning, and control. Mission-level evaluation should consider data validity, fault recovery, and safe completion rather than average localization error or shortest path alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.