Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42817383›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Label-Free Degradation Diagnosis for Classifier Selection in Hyperspectral Scenes.

Cagri Kaymak, Cem Atilgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cagri KaymakDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Firat University, 23119 Elazig, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5343-226X
Cem AtilganDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Kirklareli University, 39020 Kirklareli, Türkiye.

Funding

Fırat University FUBAP MF.25.21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In hyperspectral image classification, the most suitable classifier depends on the magnitude and the type of degradation present in the scene; this information, however, cannot be obtained without labels at the stage where the choice has to be made. A two-layer diagnosis computed before classification and without labels is proposed in this study: a severity index reports the magnitude of the degradation, while three scene-derived indicators separate independent, band-dependent, spectrally correlated and striped structures from one another, while classification itself remains supervised. The approach is evaluated on ten benchmark scenes under a leakage-aware spatial protocol. Classifier fragility is found to follow two opposing regimes: tree ensembles are robust to spatially local degradation but fragile to degradation spread across the spectrum, whereas the opposite is observed for the convolutional network. Regime-based classifier selection produces the better classification map in every combination examined. Replacing the spatial protocol with a random pixel split is further shown to inflate accuracy by between 0.162 and 0.249 and to change the best classifier in six of the ten scenes.

Indexed as

classifier robustnessdegradation structurehyperspectral image classificationintrinsic dimensionalitylabel-free degradation diagnosisspatial data leakage

Identifiers

PMID42817383
PMCPMC13611357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.