ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effects of Cervical Motion Restriction on Wheelchair Propulsion Velocity and Upper-Limb Kinematics in Healthy Individuals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forward head flexion during wheelchair propulsion has been suggested to compensate for reduced trunk muscle strength in individuals with spinal cord injury, but the influence of restricting head-neck movement on propulsion remains unclear. This study examined wheelchair propulsion under cervical fixation and non-fixation conditions. Fourteen healthy young men (20.7 ± 0.5 years) performed 5 m wheelchair propulsion under both conditions. Propulsion was recorded with a smartphone camera, and coordinates of the left ear, shoulder, elbow, and wrist were extracted using You Only Look Once version 7 (YOLO v7) to calculate upper-arm segment and elbow angles and angular accelerations. Analysis focused on the first three propulsion cycles after movement onset. Propulsion velocity showed a significant main effect of measurement point, but neither the main effect of cervical fixation nor the condition-by-point interaction was significant. Velocity increment differed significantly among measurement intervals, whereas the condition effect and interaction were not significant. Cervical fixation was associated with a smaller minimum upper-arm segment angle and greater upper-arm segment excursion, maximum elbow angle, and elbow range of motion. A significant condition-by-cycle interaction was found for minimum elbow angle, with a smaller angle under fixation during the first cycle. Minimum upper-arm segment angular acceleration in the flexion direction also differed among cycles. Thus, cervical fixation was associated with changes in upper-limb kinematics, but a statistically significant change in propulsion velocity was not demonstrated. These preliminary findings provide a basis for future studies in wheelchair users and athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.