ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Dual-Domain Shape-Polarization Optical Encoding for Detector-Multiplexed Wide-Field Infrared Small-Target Imaging.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detector-multiplexed wide-field infrared imaging reuses detector area by folding several sub-fields of view onto a common focal-plane region, but the branch identity of an aliased small target is then unavailable from intensity alone. We propose a dual-domain optical code that combines a fixed Zemax-derived point-spread-function (PSF) library with a conditionally assigned linear-polarization codebook. To replace the earlier feature-level validation, we developed an image-level radiometric simulator that generates four analyzer images under a fixed incident-photon budget, applies mirror transfer, throughput loss, Poisson shot noise, background, read noise, and physical multi-target PSF superposition, and then re-extracts morphology and Stokes observables. The 1037 PSF samples were divided by sub-field into construction, calibration, and locked test sets of 623, 207, and 207 samples. The polarization-to-field assignment was selected by an exhaustive 9! search on the construction data, whereas the compound weight and separability threshold were fixed from calibration data only. In 25,000 locked target-level tests, the equal-weight-form compound decoder achieved 95.936% accuracy (95% confidence interval of 95.684-96.174%), compared with 10.836%, 45.564%, and 88.720% for intensity-only, shape-only, and polarization-only decoding. At the calibrated threshold, the effective capacities were five, four, and nine for the shape, polarization, and compound code spaces. The results are simulation-phase evidence and require experimental verification with measured infrared throughput and component tolerances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.