ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multimode Fiber-Tip Interferometry for Time- and Frequency-Domain Analysis of Droplet Evaporation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work presents an experimental investigation of droplet evaporation dynamics using a step-index multimode fiber-tip (MMF) interferometer. Distilled water, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol (IPA), and their binary mixtures with water were analyzed through complementary frequency- and time-domain approaches. Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analysis was used to identify the dominant spectral components over selected evaporation intervals, while the instantaneous phase obtained from the analytic signal was used to track time-dependent variations in the optical response. For water, dominant components at 8.34 and 9.87 Hz corresponded to thickness-variation rates of -4.85 and -5.75 µm/s, respectively. Ethanol exhibited a dominant component at 15.8 Hz, corresponding to -9.01 µm/s, whereas IPA showed components at 13.2 and 34.8 Hz, associated with rates of -7.46 and -19.6 µm/s. Binary mixtures exhibited multiple spectral components and stronger temporal variability, indicating a nonstationary optical response during evaporation. The frequency- and time-domain results therefore provide complementary descriptions: the FFT identifies the dominant components over the selected interval, whereas instantaneous-phase analysis reveals their temporal evolution. Because the analysis was performed over short, selected evaporation intervals, the refractive index was assumed to remain approximately constant, and the measured phase variations were therefore attributed predominantly to changes in droplet thickness. The retrieved values are consequently interpreted as thickness-variation rates rather than direct mass-loss rates. The proposed approach provides a simple and compact method for monitoring droplet evaporation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.