Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42817304›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Explainable AI-Based Intrusion Detection Systems for IoT Environments: A Systematic Literature Review.

Murat Varol, Aykut Karakaya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Murat VarolDepartment of Computer Engineering, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak 67100, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2679-4278
Aykut KarakayaDepartment of Computer Engineering, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak 67100, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6970-3239

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) technology today, the number of devices connected to each other through these networks is increasing significantly, and the security risks these devices face from cyberattacks have emerged as a clear problem. Intrusion detection systems (IDSs) are emerging as a solution to this problem and play a significant role in securing IoT-based networks. Although machine learning and deep learning-based IDS approaches have achieved high accuracy rates in detecting attacks in recent years, the lack of transparency in these models' decision-making processes poses a major drawback in terms of reliability and explainability. To ensure that the decisions of IDS models are understandable and to address this issue, Explainable AI (XAI) approaches are being implemented. This study provides a detailed review of the current literature on XAI-enabled IDSs developed for IoT environments. The studies examined are systematically evaluated in terms of the deep learning models used, lightweight model designs, explainability methods and validations, approaches to protecting data privacy, and datasets. The literature review highlights that research is not only focused on the accuracy of attack detection but also aims to design IDS solutions that are lightweight, explainable, and privacy-preserving. This paper aims to provide a foundational resource to guide future research on reliable, explainable, and practical IoT intrusion detection systems by identifying the problems addressed in current research and highlighting the limitations in the literature. In addition, this work proposes and applies a study assessment framework to systematically assess methodological adequacy, experimental reproducibility, lightweight deployment, XAI techniques, and XAI validation.

Indexed as

IDSIoTlightweightXAI

Identifiers

PMID42817304
PMCPMC13611250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.