ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Quantifying the Frontal-to-Ceiling Domain Gap for YOLO-Based Hand Gesture Recognition in Smart Homes.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vision-based hand gesture recognition (HGR) systems are predominantly developed for frontal camera viewpoints, whereas smart-home cameras are often ceiling-mounted, creating a viewpoint-induced domain gap. To investigate this issue, we collected and manually annotated CeilGest, an 18-class ceiling-view hand gesture dataset comprising 156,282 annotated frames from 68 participants recorded in distinct domestic environments. We then systematically evaluated frontal-to-ceiling transfer using YOLO-based detectors trained on HaGRID and compared their performance with an in-domain CeilGest-trained model. On identical ceiling-view footage, the frontal-trained YOLOv8n produced approximately 24× more class-to-class misclassified frames than the in-domain model (486 vs. 20 across 27,000 frames); this large paired difference remained evident when temporal dependence within gesture holds was taken into account. The effect was strongly class-dependent, with AP decreasing by up to 5.5 percentage points for the worst-affected gesture, while the aggregate same-architecture mAP50 difference was 0.6 percentage points. Across five YOLOv8 variants evaluated on frontal HaGRID, mAP50 remained at 0.995, supporting selection of the lightweight YOLOv8n for edge deployment. The complete ceiling-view HGR pipeline was implemented on Raspberry Pi 5 using NCNN and Jetson Orin Nano using TensorRT. Mean inference latency was 74.69 ± 4.72 ms and 12.72 ± 0.12 ms, respectively. During a 10 min continuous Raspberry Pi 5 test, mean inference latency increased by 17.6% and junction temperature reached 90.8 °C with thermal throttling. Power consumption and INT8 inference were not evaluated. Overall, the results show that training-deployment viewpoint consistency is a major consideration for ceiling-mounted HGR and establish an in-domain supervised baseline relative to frontal-only training without domain adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.