ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Benchmarking Visual Detection Tiers for Event-Centric Edge Intelligence in Maritime Disaster Response.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid maritime incident response requires visual recognition near the point of observation, but practical deployment must balance detection accuracy, inference latency, hardware-conversion constraints, and limited communication capacity. This study benchmarks the visual-compute component of an Event-Centric Edge Intelligence (ECEI) architecture on two maritime edge tiers: a Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB Developer Kit and a reComputer AI R2000-12 based on Raspberry Pi 5. Three tasks were selected to represent distinct maritime event categories: Human Detection for person-overboard response, six-class Ship Detection for vessel monitoring and collision awareness, and eleven-class Marine Trash Detection for floating-debris and pollution monitoring. YOLO26, YOLO11, and YOLOv8 were evaluated across 54 model-dataset-device configurations. Repeated on-device validation used 100 deterministically selected images per task and 20 measured repetitions for each checkpoint, yielding 108,000 timed predictions. On the paired S/N subset, the median reComputer/AGX mean-latency ratio was 4.40×; mean latency ranged from 19.84-57.09 ms on AGX and 68.89-172.11 ms on reComputer. The highest AGX mAP50-95 values were 0.331, 0.813, and 0.639 for Human, Ship, and Marine Trash Detection, respectively; the highest reComputer values were 0.318, 0.806, and 0.558. Across the evaluated event-message configuration, event-candidate JSON bytes were 98.20% lower than raw JPEG bytes. These results support deployment-aware visual-tier selection and an auditable detector-to-event interface for maritime edge intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.