ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Ultrasonic and Resistivity Sensor Fusion for Discriminating Gas Injection Rates.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Discriminating gas injection rates in drilling fluids is essential for monitoring downhole gas influx. However, each gas bubble traversing the sensing zone causes ultrasonic and resistivity readings to depart from the baselines recorded without gas injection, while a single acquisition cycle captures only a random snapshot of the bubble distribution. In this work, a sliding window framework is developed that combines ultrasonic and resistivity measurements to distinguish gas injection rates in a vertical static liquid column. Ultrasonic and resistivity indices are extracted from individual acquisition cycles, aggregated within a 2.5 s sliding window containing five consecutive acquisition cycles, and fused by normalizing classwise products without introducing trainable parameters. Experiments were conducted in freshwater and 2.0gcm-3 water-based mud at four discrete injection rates from 0 to 0.3Lmin-1. Evaluation used cross-validation with data split by experimental repetition. The fusion framework achieved a macro F1 of 84.7% ± 4.3% in water-based mud, a gain of 6.3 percentage points over the best result from either channel alone. The classwise product also gave the highest mean macro F1 among three evaluated nontrainable fusion rules in both media. The resulting fusion framework supports gas injection rate discrimination under static column conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.