ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A High-Precision Odometry Calibration Method for Mecanum-Wheeled Mobile Robots Based on ZUPT and Closed-Loop Pose Estimation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A two-level closed-loop calibration framework is proposed to reduce odometry scale errors during motion and pose drift during stationary periods in Mecanum-wheeled mobile robots. At the upper calibration level, the planar displacement between the initial and final poses is calculated using the L2-norm, which reduces the influence of lateral deviation on distance measurements based on a single coordinate axis. Rotational displacement is obtained by accumulating normalized angular increments, thereby avoiding discontinuities when the yaw angle crosses the ±π boundary. A relay controller with a tolerance deadband is also introduced to reduce static-friction-induced stalling and oscillation near the target during low-speed calibration. At the lower odometry interface, the covariance assigned to wheel odometry measurements is adjusted according to the commanded zero-velocity state. During stationary periods, this adjustment increases the contribution of near-zero velocity measurements and limits the effect of residual velocity estimates and sensor noise on the fused pose. The identified longitudinal and rotational compensation factors are then updated online in the dead-reckoning node through an ROS 2 service. Unlike conventional ZUPT implementations, the proposed method does not require an additional zero-velocity pseudo-measurement node. Experiments were conducted on three near-horizontal surfaces: ceramic tile, epoxy resin, and asphalt. Across 720 bidirectional in-place rotation trials, the angular Error Reduction Rate ranged from (59.13%) to (96.58%). In 540 straight-line trials covering nine combinations of surface type and target distance, the overall mean absolute error decreased from 53.22 mm before calibration to 9.69 mm after calibration. Intermittent stop-and-go experiments were further performed using the EKF, UKF, RCKF, and a graph-based SLAM optimization framework implemented by slam_toolbox. For each estimation back-end, the estimated trajectory was evaluated by calculating its deviation from the corresponding synchronized /odom trajectory under the fixed-covariance and proposed ZUPT-based adaptive-covariance configurations; /odom was used as a common comparison baseline rather than as an absolute localization ground truth. The adaptive covariance strategy reduced the positional RMSE by (19.38%-67.44%) across the evaluated filtering back-ends. These results show that the proposed framework can reduce both motion-dependent odometry scale errors and stationary pose drift under the tested surface conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.