SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Affective Computing Approaches in Child-Robot Interaction: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Affective computing has become increasingly relevant in child-robot interaction (CRI), particularly in social robotics, emotion recognition, engagement assessment, and autism-related interventions. This systematic review with a critical and integrative synthesis analyzes 105 included studies to examine how affect is sensed, represented, processed, expressed, and evaluated in CRI. The literature search was conducted in IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, following a systematic screening process guided by the review objectives. A descriptive and structured narrative synthesis was conducted considering publication characteristics, robot platform and morphology, target population, sensing modalities and observed affect-relevant features, affective constructs and representation models, computational and control mechanisms, robot affective expression, evaluation strategies, and remaining research gaps. The findings show a strong emphasis on ASD-related contexts, visually observable and behavioral features, facial emotion recognition, body movement analysis, and engagement assessment. The review also identifies important limitations, including reliance on camera-based affect recognition, comparatively limited use of physiological and other complementary sensing modalities, unclear alignment between robot roles and interaction strategies, insufficient reporting of robot emotional expressiveness and control mechanisms, and limited attention to explainability, data governance, and long-term ethical implications. Based on these findings, an integrative taxonomy of affective computing in CRI is proposed, comprising six interconnected dimensions: interaction context; sensing modalities and observed features; affective constructs and representation models; computational and control mechanisms; robot affective expression; and evaluation and adaptation strategies. Rather than treating these dimensions as entirely novel categories, the taxonomy consolidates and extends previously fragmented classifications into a child-centered representation of the affective interaction process. Overall, this review argues that affective CRI should move beyond automatic emotion recognition toward multimodal, embodied, developmentally appropriate, explainable, and ethically grounded robot interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.