ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Physics-Guided Gaussian Process Mapping of Strong-Gradient Radiation Fields from Mobile Robot Surveys: The Role of Sampling Geometry.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiation fields around collimated or shielded sources exhibit strong gradients whose accurate delineation is critical for worker protection and emergency response. Mobile robots can survey such fields, but they sample sparsely and irregularly along their trajectories, and it remains unclear which reconstruction method can be trusted, and where. Using a single dominant collimated source in a two-dimensional indoor setting, this study shows that the answer depends decisively on sampling geometry, and proposes a physics-guided Gaussian process (GP) that performs reliably under trajectory-constrained sampling. A tracked robot combining light detection and ranging (LiDAR)-based simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) with a γ dose-rate detector surveyed a collimated Cs-137 field in seven independent runs, and all methods were evaluated under both random hold-out (interpolation near visited locations) and spatial block cross-validation (extrapolation into unvisited regions); truth-referenced evaluation against a dense reference field is provided by Poisson-sampled simulations, while experimental accuracy is cross-validated on held-out measurements. Under uniform sampling, a multilayer perceptron (MLP) robustly outperformed GP variants (R2=0.95, stable across 18 seed combinations); under trajectory sampling, its advantage vanished at visited locations and reversed catastrophically in unvisited regions. The proposed physics-guided GP, which uses a fitted collimated-beam template as the GP mean with a Matérn 3/2 residual process, achieved the highest extrapolation R2 (median 0.61; best baseline 0.31), reduced the extrapolation error by 32-69% relative to all eight baselines, recovered interpretable source parameters, and provided predictive intervals with approximately calibrated region-level coverage (point-wise error ranking remains weak); a runtime fit-quality gate further renders the correctness of the embedded prior an observable quantity, so the method flags when its own assumptions fail. These results offer quantitative guidance for method selection in robotic radiation mapping under the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.