ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Risk-Aware Fault-Tolerant Multisensor Fusion for Human-Machine Decision Support in Autonomous Navigation and Mooring in Confined Waters.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observation-Domain-Aware Multisensor Fusion for Intelligent Coastal Water-Quality Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autonomous navigation and mooring in confined waters require a navigation solution that remains reliable when individual sensing channels are delayed, unavailable, or environmentally degraded. A risk- and integrity-aware architecture was developed for joint processing of RTK-GNSS, inertial and heading measurements, short-range radar, LiDAR, camera, AIS, ultrasonic ranging, propulsion feedback, environmental, and mooring-line tension data. Asynchronous time alignment is combined with sensor-quality assessment, innovation-based fault detection and isolation, covariance adaptation, active-set reconfiguration, protection-level monitoring, and risk-dependent allocation of authority between automation and the operator. The system was evaluated during a five-day campaign comprising 40 runs, four operational phases, 480 synchronized evaluation epochs, and 16 controlled single-sensor or combined sensor-degradation events. Under nominal conditions, horizontal-position and heading RMSE were 0.043 m and 0.176°, respectively. All 64 fault-active diagnostic records were identified; mean event-log detection and controlled-recovery latencies were 3.17 s and 6.34 s. Horizontal protection-level coverage was 99.3% for single-fault epochs and 100% for combined-fault epochs. One combined-fault docking run contained five consecutive aborted decision epochs, while no unsafe-autonomy event was recorded. The measurements therefore indicate bounded degradation of the navigation solution and conservative transfer of authority when sensing integrity decreases. Because all injected-fault runs were acquired under adverse weather whereas nominal runs were acquired under calm or moderate conditions, the condition-class RMSE differences reported below are descriptive and must not be interpreted as isolated causal effects of sensor faults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.